Saunders and Walker Class Action Law Firm
Watch This Introductory Video to Saunders and Walker Law

Phone:

1-800-748-7115

Email Joe Saunders at Saunders and Walker
Menu 

High Risk Medical Devices Modified Without Oversight or Data

high risk medical devices

 

In my last post, I wrote about the significant dangers of the accelerated drug approval process.  The situation concerning the modification of medical devices is actually worse.

A new study by researchers at the University of California San Francisco and Yale School of Medicine found that modifications to approved high risk medical devices can be modified without scientific data to demonstrate the safety and benefit of the modification.

“This means that many Americans have high-risk devices, which are often implanted in which we cannot be sure of safety and effectiveness,” says study senior author Rita Redberg.

Adding insult to injury (literally), these devices are not subject to lawsuits when they fail and injure patients.  “This means,” the researchers wrote Aug. 15 in JAMA, “that patients lack legal recourse if a (high-risk) device is faulty and adversely affects health outcomes. Thus, it is vital to ensure safety and effectiveness by requiring high-quality clinical data before high-risk devices reach the market. The findings that few supplementary changes require clinical data, and that when they do the data are often low quality, raise uncertainty about performance of many commonly used devices.”

The court decision that barred lawsuits involving the safety of devices that have gone through the FDA’s more detailed review process is based on the assumption the process is “already an assurance of safety and effectiveness,” Redberg said. It is important, she added, that the process have “high quality data on which to base that assurance.”

“There’s a lot of pressure on the FDA to speed things up, to let innovative or life-changing treatments go to market,” said Redberg, who is a professor of medicine at UCSF author, “but you don’t know if they’re innovative or life-changing until you’ve done a careful study. These were short studies, with low-quality data, and little follow-up after approval.”

After high-risk medical devices are cleared through the FDA’s premarket approval (PMA) process, any change or supplement is required to be submitted to the agency for review. Individual devices frequently have hundreds of changes.

According to the new study, for example, between 1979 and 2012, there were more than 5,800 supplements for 77 approvals for cardiac implantable electronic devices. This means “many high-risk devices differ substantially from the originally approved device,” according to the study. And the total number of device approvals has been increasing over time.

This accelerated approval process only benefits one constituency-the medical device industry and leaves the patient vulnerable to serious injury.

“Almost all PMA (pre-market approval) devices, which range from orthopedic knee replacements to cochlear implants and infusion pumps, accumulate several—and often hundreds—of supplements,” They wrote. “Companies often submit changes to a device one supplement at a time instead of submitting multiple changes in a single application. As a result, each submitted modification is evaluated separately, a process that makes it difficult, if not impossible, to take into account the cumulative effects and interactions of multiple modifications. Because the PMA supplement process is piecemeal, the accumulation of supplements may result in a final product that differs significantly from the original device. Clinicians are generally unaware that the device they are considering for their patient has been modified (and often not tested) since they read about the original, unmodified device in published clinical trials.”

What can patients do to protect themselves?

“Patients should have a discussion with their physician about risks and benefits and the quality of evidence to support any device or procedure that has been recommended,” Redberg noted. “That discussion should be part of informed consent for device implantation.”

As in the pharmaceutical industry, the medical device industry operates in a world designed for its own benefit with little or no regard to the patient.  

Accelerated Drug Approval Process Blamed for Harmful Drugs

Two new studies, published in JAMA and The Millbank Quarterly, blame the accelerated drug approval process for harmful drugs entering the marketplace.  The accelerated approval of drugs created by the FDA in 1992 during the HIV/AIDS crisis, is designed for quicker approval of drugs that treat serious conditions and fill an unmet medical need.  However,Continue Reading

As Country Reels from Opioid Crisis, Big Pharma Cashes In

The opioid crisis in this country is reaching epidemic proportions.  It affects small towns as well as large metropolises.  It ruins the lives of young and old, poor and wealthy.  All the while, pharmaceutical companies were paying huge sums of money to doctors promoting prescription opioids. According to new study published in the American JournalContinue Reading

Date Set for First Taxotere Bellwether Trial

  A date has been set for the first Taxotere bellwether trial. Court proceedings are now scheduled to begin on September 24, 2018 in the Eastern District of Louisiana. This bellwether trial will be the first in a small group of lawsuits chosen from the over 1200 Taxotere lawsuits currently filed. The outcomes of theseContinue Reading

Verdict Upheld in Risperdal Case Against Janssen Pharmaceutical

A $2.5 million verdict in the first Risperdal case to go to jury related to the condition gynecomastia has been upheld, after a judge in Philadelphia refused Janssen Pharmaceutical’s motion seeking a new trial Johnson & Johnson – parent company to Janssen Pharmaceutical – had originally been ordered by a Philadelphia jury to pay $2.5Continue Reading

Los Angeles Jury Awards Talc Powder Victim $417 Million

In the largest verdict thus far in talc powder lawsuits, a Los Angeles jury has awarded a 63-year-old woman $417 million, finding the manufacturer of the talcum powder, Johnson & Johnson liable for failing to warn her about the risks associated with ovarian cancer. The plaintiff, Eva Echeverria, was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2007.Continue Reading

Illinois Eliminates Statute of Limitations for Sex Abuse Crimes Against Children

Illinois Governor Bruce Rauner signed legislation that removes the statutes of limitation for sexual abuse crimes against children making it much easier for adults who were childhood victims of abuse to come forward and seek justice. However, the new law is limited in its scope. Barbara Blaine, the founder of Survivors Network of those AbusedContinue Reading

Court Reverses Ethicon Ruling In Favor of Victim

In Philadelphia Judge Michael Erdos has granted plaintiff Kimberly Adkins’ post-trial motion requesting a damages hearing in her lawsuit against Johnson &Johnson subsidiary Ethicon. This means that the only transvaginal mesh lawsuit won by Johnson & Johnson in the Philadelphia pelvic mesh mass tort has been reversed. This plaintiff’s case had been the fifth to goContinue Reading

Monsanto Roundup Lawsuits Grow to Over 800

Monsanto Roundup Cancer litigation continues to grow with recent actions filed in Alabama, Oklahoma, and Georgia adding to the over 800 lawsuits already filed nationwide. The litigation against Monsanto began after a March 2016 World Health Organization declaration that there was sufficient evidence to classify the weed killer glyphosate – better known by its commercialContinue Reading

Does FDA Approval Really Mean Anything?

It’s a serious question all of us should be asking ourselves. Does the governmental agency’s approval of a drug or medical device whose mission is to protect the safety and welfare of consumers mean anything?  Does it mean the drug or device is safe to use and will work the way in which the manufacturerContinue Reading



Fill out this form for a FREE, Immediate, Case Evaluation

Home Banner Form

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Saunders and Walker Class Action Law Firm

Call Us 24/7
1-800-748-7115
joe@saunderslawyers.com

Connect with us

  • facebook
  • Google+
  • youtube
  • LinkedIn

Saunders & Walker
3491 Gandy Blvd
Pinellas Park, FL 33781
Phone: (727) 579-4500
Phone: 1-800-748-7115

Click Here for Map

Saunders & Walker, P.A. Copyright© 2005 - . All rights reserved.

Website Design, Development and Marketing - Best Edge SEM